Press "Enter" to skip to content

Tag: market

The Trouble Facing Regional Banks

The following is an aggregation of thoughts on the burgeoning banking crisis, as posted in the Daily Contrarian. Subscribe to receive the briefing and accompanying podcast each market day morning.

Last weekend saw the dramatic rescue of Silicon Valley National Bank (SIVB) and Signature Bank of New York (SBNY). The market reaction was drastic, with investors punishing regional bank stocks and today shifting their focus to European banks. Credit Suisse (CS) dropped to an all-time low after its largest investor ruled out further capital infusions.

Unfortunately, the underlying issue facing banks in the US at least remains unresolved. Banks still hold large amounts of held-to-maturity, or HTM, assets. These are US Treasuries and other government bonds that don’t need to be marked-to-market if they are (you guessed it) held to maturity. The problem is if these assets need to be sold, in which case they do need to be marked-to-market. If that happens it leaves banks with a huge hole in their balance sheets from the ensuing write down. See Silicon Valley Bank, which tried to plug their hole with a capital raise. Didn’t work. This issue of HTMs has been known for some time. Here’s a Wall Street Journal piece from November.

By closing Signature Bank, regulators presumably removed the domino that they believed would be the next to fall. The Fed for its part set up an emergency lending program called the Bank Term Funding Program, or BTFP, to shore up liquidity in the financing system. The question now is how effective these measures will be. There is reason to believe they should be at least somewhat effective, according to our guest on this week’s podcast.

That’s great, but then what about the business viability of these regional banks? If depositors are worried about their money it stands to reason that they will move it to a larger financial institution. How can smaller regional banks compete with these juggernauts, especially if they are faced with larger regulatory burdens as can be expected? At best, their margins will be severely pressured. At worst they will have to deal with a run on their deposits.

Leave a Comment

Trader With 380% Gains in 2022 Tells Us Why He’s Fully Allocated to Cash (Szn 5, Ep 6)

Season 5, Episode 6 feat Mark Szemeszki

This podcast episode brought to you by Covey — Covey is designed to find, reward, and train the next top investment managers —from any background—that anyone can copy, so everyone can win.

Mark Szemeszki joins the podcast to discuss his highly profitable short crypto trades from last year and why his business cycle theory has him sitting in cash.

Content Highlights

  • Three-hundred-and-eighty percent (380%) returns last year. How did he do it? (2:47);
  • The macro view and leading indicators are pointing to a recession right now, which makes risk-taking more problematic in the short term (4:17);
  • His short crypto trades predate the FTX saga (7:33);
  • More on his business cycle theory (10:32);
  • Inflationary pressure is real, including from China’s reopening (13:37);
  • More information on catalysts sought when shorting altcoins (16:17);
  • Shorting the narrative on altcoins is a good strategy if you can get a good entry point (20:20);
  • Background on the guest (25:08);
  • More on his trades last year (27:13);
  • Probably 99% of crytpo currencies are useless, even Bitcoin and Ethereum (29:37).

More Information on the Guest

Quick Highlights From Our YouTube Channel

Leave a Comment

The New Narrative, a lot like the Old Narrative

Concerns about inflation and Fed rate hikes are front and center again as focus turns to January’s CPI print…

The following is an amended version of the Feb. 13 Daily Contrarian. This briefing and accompanying podcast are released to premium subscribers each market day morning by 0700. To subscribe, visit our Substack or Supercast.

It’s a big week with the Consumer Price Index supplying a fresh inflation reading Tuesday.

Last week wasn’t great for stocks. In fact, it was the worst week of the year so far. Inflation was one persistent theme to emerge from earnings, which from the looks of it is getting investors to rethink the narrative that the Fed can start cutting rates later this year.

In reality that narrative was foolish to begin with. More importantly, it wasn’t due to any tangible comments by Fed officials — some off-the-cuff hints by Powell that probably weren’t even intended as such were enough to get investors to pile into risk assets, however temporarily.

So apparently the narrative has shifted again, from ‘soft landing’ to ‘higher for longer.’ From ‘don’t fight the tape’ to ‘don’t fight the Fed.’ Which means this meme can safely be unearthed again:

Don't Fight the Med MaryJane meme

Reality Check

This latest market activity is a bit of a relief to those of us who were questioning our sanity coming in to last week. Markets can stay irrational for awhile (longer than we can stay solvent, as the saying goes) but maybe this latest bout of bullish irrationality just wasn’t long for this world to begin with.

Two things we’ve been pointing out the whole way: 1) the Fed record of engineering soft landings is not good, and 2) there is a lag effect between when the Fed sets interest rates and when these are felt in the real economy.

This doesn’t make for a particularly constructive environment for risk allocation and makes the January rally look like a dead cat bounce.

Now that that’s settled, we can consider all the ways that it’s wrong. Have at it.

Podcast Excerpt

Quick highlight from today’s podcast (available in its entirety for premium subscribers) courtesy of our YouTube channel:

Leave a Comment