Press "Enter" to skip to content

Category: Bonus

Bonus content for members only

The Case for Mining Stocks, with Matt Zabloski, Delbrook Capital — Transcribed

Below is a transcript of the Season 1, Episode 3 podcast, which can be listened to here.

NB: Welcome to the Contrarian Investor Podcast, where we give voice to those challenging a prevailing view in financial markets. I’m your host, Nathaniel E. Baker. On this podcast we discuss the metals and mining sector of the equities market. Now this is a sector that has not been very interesting at all lately. In fact, it’s been one big disappointment going back about ten years or more. But therein lies, the opportunity, or so says our guest, Matt Zabloski of Delbrook Capital in Vancouver, British Columbia. Matt manages a long short equity fund focused on this very sector, and he has some very interesting things to say about the supply demand imbalance, in particular as it affects certain industrials metals. Before I roll the tape, a disclaimer that nothing we say should be taken as investment advice. This podcast is for entertainment purposes only. Lastly, what you’re about to hear is a recorded phone conversation from Friday May 3 and while Matt comes through loud and clear. I am once again a bit muffled and maybe even a little bit difficult to understand at certain points. But luckily it’s Matt speaking more than me. Like I said, He has a lot of interesting things to say, So let’s get to it. Here you go. Enjoy.

NB: You know, if I look at the chart here of one of the ETFs which tracks the, um, metals and mining sector, XME is I believe the oldest one. And this goes back to, um I think that it launched in 2006. So if you look at the chart, like there it peaked in early. It looks like, you know, second quarter of 2008, and then fell off of a cliff along with everything else later that year and then had a brief recovery into what looks like early 2011 and then kind of started a long downdraft. That probably coincided with the whole commodities sell off, but the point is that, if took your money and put it in Call it 2009, Um, I wouldn’t say your returns matched the S&P. Much less the tech sector or anything like that. So the question there is, you know why now, Um, what do you like about this? Where the opportunity. So, yeah, maybe can probably through that, though.

MZ: Sure, you know. So for us, the very important thing to realize is we’re obviously an equity long short fund. So when you look at something like the XME and you commented, it’s not been a great place to be on the long side. We we concur. However, it’s important, you know, from our strategy standpoint, that we are actually long/short. We see opportunities in both directions.But for us, really, if you wanted to effect what’s happened to the sector in the last decade and it’s important to realize that the crash of 2008, 2009 coincided with with obviously a commodities meltdown, everything the entire asset class meltdown. But, you know, that was after five or six years of very strong commodities markets on the back of the Chinese sort of super cycle, if you will, Um what what happened prior to 2008 and the commodities face through that supercycle was, you know, massive expansion across the board for most metals. Which involved allocation of capital in a, you know, very inefficient manner. I’m talking about, you know, projects that were built by major mining companies globally, Basically, with the belief the commodities would continue to go higher. Ah, they obviously did not. So we ended up with massive excess capacity, uh, and projects that had subpar return on invested capital. Um, the result of which was was a complete, uh, meltdown of the equity evaluation of most major mining companies. And the resulting, um, halting of all development and capital expenditures in the space. So you know that that’s really what we’ve actually been eating through in the last ten to twelve years is that access? What that means, though, is in the near term, as we get through, um, the depletion of those resources that were built a decade or two ago. We spend no money, uh, no capital exploration for additional pounds of copper around gold, um, building new mines. You know, the reason we’re bullish on select areas within the space right now is the

[inaudible]

has occurred, and this money companies have not reinvested in greenfield exploration. and quite honestly, what’s happening is we’re getting a squeeze in certain commodity prices where supply has dried up. You have demand that for certain thematic reasons is beginning to accelerate and I’ll discuss that in a second. But really what we’re really looking at right now is the perfect storm of ten plus years of underinvestment. As you know, a mine is a depleting resource with when you pull copper out of the ground, it doesn’t regenerate itself. It’s gone. So, yes, we we’ve had an atrocious time on the long side in the space in the last ten years. But certain events, including underinvestment in the space are going to lead to, in our belief, the perfect storm for certain commodities. You know, one thing that really gets us excited at the moment is the acceleration of the electric vehicle or the electrification thesis. Electric vehicles require four to five times more base metals in the car, in terms of not only storage of energy but the transmission of energy, than the typical combustion engine. So we could really paint a picture here of supply shortages and certain commodities like copper. And if you sort of apply the electrification, this is not only to the vehicle itself, but also to the infrastructure that’s out there for distribution of power. Not just in the U.S. but globally. You know, certain commodities we think are primed for much higher prices. And as you and I both know, when certain commodities move, they don’t just do so at a slow pace, you know, five or six percent a year, these things go parabolic. So I mean, for us that, you know, in essence, demand is much stronger than the market is. More importantly, we’ve depleted a lot of the supply. And any additional supply that may be able to come online requires much higher prices to make an economic impact.

NB: Okay, I’m curious about the demand picture, especially for copper. And you mentioned electronic cars. Do you know how that breaks down as far as electric car demand for copper versus good old traditional construction? And where most of that’s coming from?

MZ: Yeah. So if you look at the demand for copper right now, electric vehicles are still very much a low single digit demand component for that to be honest. The majority of copper demand right now still does come from Asia. However, I think what’s important to realize it’s a second derivative, which is the accelerating pace of electric vehicle consumption of copper within thi. So, you know, if we look at five years ago, it wasn’t even on the radar screen. Now we can point to ten to fifteen percent, um, sort of electrification demand for copper. But that’s accelerating, right? In terms of market share for electric vehicles is very small right now, but growing in a very, very quick pace. So, by 2025, 2030, it’s going to be a significant, um, component of copper demand. Now you say, Well, 2030 that’s a long time from now. The average within the money space from discovery of a resource, through permitting development in commercial production just now takes seventeen plus years. You know, we’re at a critical time for the space. Resources that we found are much lower grade and in areas of the world that you typically don’t necessarily want to deploy a lot of capital for geopolitical reasons. So this is critical phase where copper, we’ll begin to be seeing prices that should reflect that. We can paint a picture in the short term of, you know, 350 copper without much difficulty. And I’m talking about 350 copper into the end of this year.

NB: We’re talking about them upside of about, uh, 25 percent, right?

MZ: Right. So for us, you got to realize the nature of where we play as a long/short fund. We’re playing in the equities. The underlying companies with exposure to [inaudible]. So how we generate our returns here, um, both long short. But you know, is is within the equity spectrum where we’re also picking up the financial leverage of that company and the operating leverage of that company. So when comparable, it’s twenty five percent. That could be, you know, a hundred percent in in an equity valuations. In terms of supply. There’s very little a very limited number of new greenfield project coming online within the next. Call it five to seven years, you know, will point to the Cobra Panama project that is being developed right now in Panama. That’s sort of the biggest one that’s out there. We are seeing a lot of green field exploration into areas like central Africa. Specifically the Congo. We also have, uh, situations in Zambia where, you know, phenomenal resource belt, um, and great potential. So when I make the comment that you know what is being found now is much lower grade and or they carry an entirely different geopolitical risk. Which is fine. You know, we can get comfortable with that. However, what it requires for us, it’s just a different, you know, risk metric within the matrix of judging long positions for us. [Inaudible] Well, basically saying we got to get paid for that additional risk through the upside and evaluation.

NB: Very interesting. Okay, are there any other areas, other metals that you’re particularly bullish on or do you think this is more about copper?

MZ: Our overriding approach is to take each and every metal in the universe. Develop a demand supply analysis, Come up with the thesis. Bullish, bearish, neutral and then implement allocation of capital based on, you know, high level use of the commodity. But then, based on fundamental analysis of the under lying equities, um, places that we’re bullish at the moment, You know, we find a lot of value right now in trading pairs. So relative value trading within the industrial metals complex. We are, you know, for most high level. We’re pretty neutral on gold. We’re not gold bugs. Um, gold does make up about forty percent of the gross exposure within our funds. But the net exposure is very low. So you know, we’re we’re bullish on the prospects for some of the relative value trade within the space, you know, And that’s something where we’re running very low net. But just given, you know, the inefficiency in the market at the moment, you know, generating some very significant alpha on the relative value book.

NB: Interesting.

MZ: And we’ve begun to see certain other themes play out that we’ve been writing about for, you know, twelve to eighteen months, things that consolidation, right, we turn an acceleration of consolidation within the space. Something we believe is driven by one of my previous points, which was depleting resources, needing to be back in the field, uh, not being able to do it with exploration. So the majors are now going to have to go and acquire resources. That is the most efficient, both in terms of time, but also in terms of risk. The most efficient way to backfill a declining reserve base in declining production in the future. So that we’ve been on for call it, you know, twelve to eighteen months. Our fund has had six take outs in the last six months. So we’ve been very good at identifying those opportunities that’s generated significant offer for our LPs.

NB: You mentioned the short side and that you have an active short book. Where? Where are some of those opportunities? How do you how you trade that?

MZ: Yeah. So we we basically divide the short book, if you will, into two categories. One is the short leg of relative value pairs trade. What we’re looking for there is based on valuation, or we’re very active shorting some of the ETFs, basically to generate also based purely on security selection. So we’ll sort of basket gold ETFs for a certain equities, for example, and then go long a small basket of higher quality companies. And the trade there for us is simply security selection. Any other side of the short trade for us is what we call alpha generating shorts.

NB: Yeah.

MZ: You know, where we’ve identified one of two things. Either a fatal flaw in the project. We have a very strong technical team internally here. Geologists, engineers, etcetera. So we’ve identified a fatal flaw in a project that we think the market has not come around to yet. It’s a great place to go hunting. The market is inefficient but it’s very much so, um, even more inefficient. On the short side, we’ve been running [inaudible] at twelve months. Plus net net long and that for us, has been anywhere from sort of twenty five to sixty percent net long. The opportunities that we see there is, You know, the high over arching thesis has been that squeeze within certain commodities we talked about previously. And also the fact that equity evaluations in the space, even at spot pricing, are at, you know, generational lows. This space has been ignored by institutions in the last decade. But we all know, you know, the [inaudible] very cyclical, and it’s our belief that that cycle is turning.

NB: Yeah, I think that’s a good place to, uh, pause and take a short break. We’re going to come back and I want to drill down a little bit, if you’ll pardon the pun, and ask you about some very some specific ideas that you have on the long side, I think that’ll be really interesting. So more on that when we come back. You are listening to contrarian investor podcast. We are on itunes, and anywhere else you can find podcasts pretty much: Sticher, Spotify um what are the other ones Google play now? So yeah, check it out. We’re on the social media as well. Um, Twitter’s the most active: podcontrarian is the handle there. Matt, what about you where we can we find you?

MZ: If folks are interested in learning more about Delbrook, you can look for us DelbrookCapital.com And you can just do go out or you can email us at invest@delbrookcapital.com

NB: Right on. So, yes, how about a little more about you and your background?

MZ: Yeah, sure. So, you know, starting with I I suppose my background ah launched Delbrook in 2011. Prior to that, I was based in Boston. I was a portfolio manager for Fidelity Management Research Company. For a good chunk of the 2000s. Then came out to Vancouver, originally Canadian. My background, Um, Vancouver is the mecca, if you will, of the metals and mining world, Very much probably is for for technology. So I saw an opportunity in a specific sector that we thought was, um, mispriced at the time. But also, sitting in Vancouver, you know, the ability to have a first mover advantage in the ability to have sort of unfettered access to the large caps that are in the city. You know, we are the only [inaudible] hedge fund, um, in in the city, probably one of the only ones in North America. Uh, that’s truly a hedge fund, not private equity. So for us, the competitive advantage being in Vancouver. Not only the corporates, but also to the banking teams and everything else that goes on. And they’re in the city. So, you know, it’s a great place for us to run the middle of the money. Not a lot of guys in the space and go back to what I’ve been saying. It’s completely inefficient. We’re making, you know, some some good money in the space at the moment. We think over time, market given the cyclicality. Capital will come back, but we definitely have a great first mover advantage in this. Most of our process very much starts with a top down Look at the quantity. Um, in in particular, we keep the man supply models. I’m probably two thousand different metals globally. Um, from that it sort of points in the direction of what we think of the commodity I am. We get to work on the underlying fundamentals Ah, of of, of businesses, of of operating companies within the space. And, you know, we’re not a c t a. So we we don’t trade the actual commodity. But what we enjoy doing and what we think we’re good at is identify opportunities and the underlying equity or credit rating companies in the space. And by doing so, we pick up, you know, not only a movement in the commodity price. But we pick up the operating leverage in the financial leverage of the company. So for us, we think it’s, you know, the best place to the point capital in the space. Um, and as mentioned, where one of the only friends doing it at the moment.

NB: Interesting. Okay. Give us one important lesson. Maybe that you could identify that you’ve learned in your investing career.

MZ: The most important one. If you had to pick one. Sure. I mean, and it applies to this basically managing right now. We never get emotional. Never, you know, gets fixated on any of these ideas. As I try to practice and I preach to all of our investment teams and analysts, it’s, you know, be flexible with your views and I realize that that circumstances change and if you’re good at your job, you’Ll change with them. You’LL adapt your, um, your outlook accordingly. Those who don’t do that are the guys who who, you know get run over by these markets, especially when we’re managing equities in a thirty or forty vol universe.

NB: Okay, favorite long idea. Before we go there, I just want to play Devil’s Advocate for a minute here on the whole commodity thing, especially when it relates to copper. And a lot of this is so cyclical. I mean, okay, you mentioned the secular trends specifically the electronification of cars and how that’s causing more demand for copper. But by your own admission it is still a relatively small, though growing part of the demand picture. And with all this boils down to demand still coming from, you know, people building stuff specifically China and with that part of the world economy, kind of, uh, you know, slowing down a little bit. And with the US probably closer to a recession than anything else with all that going on on the demand side doesn’t that really the one driver of demand for copper. And isn’t it? Couldn’t it be a little bit, uh, you know, naive to pick stocks within that area when with the demand picture is so uncertain for the near and medium term.

MZ: Yeah, So I touch two points there, first of all, I mean, yes, we’re sort of mid long term bullish on copper, but you know, the opportunities that we have in the space right now, it’s both long and short, you know? That is, you know, an equity pair where we go long a quality copper company and short another one.

NB: Right.

MZ: [Inaudible] From the higher level standpoint. I mean, the current status quo in the world economy. Right now we’re in deficit for copper. So we’re in a copper deficit going to 2020. [Inaudible] Now, if we overlay prices needed to bring new production online they must that be much higher. Combined with that is the fact that certain macro sorry certain demand things are beginning to accelerate just beginning right now. You know, things like New Mexico

[inaudible]

replacement in first big infrastructure bill, which we think the Trump administration will try to play out in the next call it, uh, six to twelve months in anticipation of election. So these are all big demand drivers for copper, which really aren’t priced in right now. On the supply side, we have mines depleting and mines coming off line. But we also have large things like labor unrest in South America that pops its head up every once in a while and shuts down large mines. So, you know, for us, we’ve you copper. We’re bullish on copper in simply in the context of current macro environment. In addition to that we are finding now ridiculously lower grades than it used to be even ten years ago. So you still got to move the same tunnel rock. But if you’re getting how the copper out of that rock that you, you know versus ten years ago, you’re wondering where the margins are going. And the fact of the matter is these companies are now very much focused on generating cash flow, not just building for the sake of building. [inaudible] You probably have some of the higher cost mines come off line. And that’s that’s just going to help on the supply side. So, you know. Yes, we’re pushing copper for the right reason. Also bullish on certain other, uh, metals, you know, things like nickel class one nickel. But it’s always sort of very hard for us to model and analyze demand, right? I mean, you agree on the supply side modeling and understanding cash costs occurs. We always sort of look and say, Look, within the context of the current global demand where are we at and can we identify black swan events that would seriously inhibit that demand?

NB: Yeah, absolutely.

MZ: Can we you know, risk those accordingly. However, within the context of the world economy right now, which is relatively healthy. We see there being a shortage of copper. That’s only going to accelerate.

NB: Okay, good. Excellent lead in to the next question. Stock picks.

MZ: Within the large gas space, you know, we like names like teck, teck resources. That’s a company where we see probably fifty percent upside from current levels. It’s a mining company focused on unmet call, uh, copper and zinc with a little bit of oil and gas exposure. And there is a diversified minor which, you know we believe is generate significant free cash flow and is in a position to, uh, buy back in material amount of their float in the next year. A great balance sheet, cash building. And that’s what we like to see any space.

NB: Um, cool. Sorry to interrupt. Stock picker T-E-C-K.

MZ: Yeah, so that’s, you know, one of the larger cap ones that we like. Ah, we we managed across, you know, the gamut in terms of market caps, you know, from the fifty billion dollar companies down to the five hundred million dollar companies. On a liquidity risk basis, we think TECK is a great investment right now. We think the real focus, we had some acquisitions in the last call it twelve months. [inaudible] We believe that the next wave of consolidation is going to be within sort of the mid cap space in the mining sector. We position our fund to take advantage of on the long side of sort of our top top five ideas within that space.

NB: Okay. Wonderful Matt Zabloski. Thank you so much for joining us. That’s all for this week’s program. Thank you for listening. And we look forward to speaking with you again next week.

Leave a Comment

Spinoffs Create Value in Equity Markets, With Jim Osman — Transcribed

Below is the transcription of the Season 1, Episode 2 podcast, which can be listened to here.

NB: Welcome to the contrarian investor podcast, where we give voice to those challenging a perceived with them in financial markets. My name is Nathaniel E. Baker. I am your host. So for the first couple of episodes, we focused on what might be called big picture items or the macro view, if you would. We’re talking about the global economy, various pockets of risk that could upend growth, yield curves, inverted yield curves, chances for recession and things like that. And for this episode, I thought what might be interesting is to focus more on the micro, to take somebody who had a contrarian view on individual securities and is willing to come on to the show and to discuss his view. I was fortunate to find an individual who is willing to do just that. Jim Osman is the founder and CEO of the Edge Group. Jim is going to discuss the situation around the Dow DuPont spin offs. There’s actually more than on spinoff here, and the whole thing was, of course, the result of a merger in 2017 between Dow and DuPont. For our purposes as contrarians, what’s interesting is that Dow DuPont, which is DWDP, has not performed well at all this year. It’s missed the entire rally in equities, and Dow, which listed on April 1, has basically been flat since then, as well, maybe it’s up a bit. But according to our guest, now is the time to buy not only both of the stocks but also the third, which is going to spin off on June 1. In fact, it’s the third one that he’s potentially most bullish on, saying it is the crown jewel in the entire thing. One final note is that this podcast is for entertainment purposes only. Nothing we say should be taken as investment advice. Finally, this was a pre recorded telephone call on April 24. And while Jim come through loud and clear, I sound like I have the world’s largest sinus infection. So please keep that in mind. But luckily it’s mostly him talking and not me. So give it a listen and then get in touch and let us know what you thought. Here we go. Let’s roll the tape.

NB: Dow Dow DuPont, which is DWDP, and there’s soon to be a third on June 1, Corteva. I think I’m pronouncing that right. That’s going that symbol will be CTVA. Yes, Um, and that that’s that’d be the agricultural business. But that’s really the interesting thing here. Is that Dow and DowDuPont they’ve kind of missed the whole rally that we saw in the broader stock market.

JO: Yeah, I’ve actually got a good answer for that.

NB: I hope you do. That’s why I have you on the show. I guess that’s the first question is why do you like these? In light of everything that kind of happened recently,

JO: DowDuPont has been a process, and, that process has come to an end. Let’s just wind this back a little bit. It started in 2014 with the activist Third Point getting involved, figuring that these companies will be better apart. The general trend today is that big is better. And we’ve seen that in a number of areas really. But in some areas, smaller and more focused is a lot better for investors. And we’re seeing that here. DowDupont. Let’s get this straight. We’ve got a material science business with Dow, we’ve got a specialty products agriculture with DowDupont and Corteva, agricultural. They’re semi-intertwined but…there’s a good argument for them, you know, being separate and being on their own. So to answer your question and just to give you that that background. yeah, we’ve seen this before [inaudible] there’s this perception of, uh, spinoffs are great, and as soon as spin out you should buy them because it was value creation and, you know, restructurings as well. And we do a lot of those special situations, but what I found over the period, you know, ten, fifteen, twenty years of doing this is that it doesn’t happen all at once, and particularly not the more complex restructurings. It’s not always good to get in first and, countrary to popular opinion. So what we’ve seen is, a lot of, uh, sorting out of the three independent companies and a little change in management and facts and figures come out and all this stuff contributes to investors shying away from these sorts of situations. Because ultimately, if you’re uncertain and stuff or there’s not the correct figures, then you’re just not going invest. So I think that’s been the primary reason why these stocks haven’t performed just yet, but I think the best is yet to come. You know, we’ve found that certainly in these restructurings to let them go a little bit. Let the management show what they’re worth and then get involved. But I think we’ve come to a time now where we got three or soon to be three very, very good companies and investors should be taking a look, at least. NB: Okay, so why now exactly, as we record this on April 24. DWDP listed on April 1, so about three weeks, but do you think that right now is the time to buy that and Dow?

JO: Absolutely. I mean, I was thinking the other day, you know, to myself and looking at these things again, what would I want to buy? And, um, you know what? Quite frankly, it’s a little bit funny, but all of them. And, um, and for for very different reasons. You’ve got various things going on in all of them. I mean, you got for a very, very experienced leadership. I mean, people discount that, and I don’t think a lot has been, um, said about that. Some of your listeners will know him from the Tyco days when he split up Tyco and was very, very successful that so these people have been around a long, long time, and they’ve been working on this split up for a while as well. And just to add in in in our researct: we looked at a study with Deloitte the last twenty years. If companies prepared more than six months for a break out and these guys overprepared a lot more than that, then, uh, these spin offs tend to be much, much more successful. So quality management, you got a factual by study we’ve done. And you got three very, very focused companies now. We’ve got lots of things to back this up and we believe it’s a good buy. But we almost think that, you know, maybe the best is yet to come with Corteva. But we can talk about that in a bit.

NB: Yeah, let’s talk about Corteva in a bit. But for now, the two companies that are public, what about the fundamentals? Like, what is it there that you that you like?

JO: Yeah. Absolutely. DWDP. So it’s a high margin profile compared to other businesses and it’s a it’s a high peer average as well. So we think that could be a real focused business going forward. We like it. We like the management. We expect that to perform going down the line. Dow really is an interesting one. I mean, I personally favor that one. It’s involved in plastics, and, you know, there’s an argument for well, hold on a second. You know, people aren’t using that stuff anymore. But on the contrary. This company’s been growing throughout the years and, even the fact that people have been cutting back on plastics and recycling. I don’t think that Dow was going to turn into recycling company at any stage. But plastics are scheduled to increase, or triple of the next ten years. Why? Because people using less metal products I mean, just cars coming in, people using more plastics there, um, and things like that. Um, so that’s what I think people will be missing. I mean, people who are, you know, so concentrated on the bad stuff. Actually, you know, there’s going to be real growth in plastics [inaudible] we know there’s a There’s a ban in India now. There’s a ban in Europe. Now, um, I think everything has to be plastics by, um, is it 2021. [inaudible] So, uh, like I say, we like that for the expansion in the gross story.

NB: Now, one of the inputs in plastics as you know is, actually oil. And there’s other raw materials that go into producing these things. And there’s been a big rally in energy markets. Now, certainly that would affect the bottom line of these plastics company, wouldn’t it?

JO: Well, yes. I mean, like I said, we tend not to focus on too much of that stuff. I mean, okay, now, from a macro point of view, you know, the basic point. Oil goes up and down. I mean, it depends on more the type of view you’re going to look at this all the time. But yeah, it’s a key. But oil is important is that can pull through everything in the economy. You know, you can kind of over think a little bit too much, but we prefer to concentrate on the metrics and rather not so much on the macro considerations.

NB: Okay. And so then also, the fact that a lot of these companies’ businesses is cyclical and, you know, the economic cycle is probably closer to the end than to the beginning. And so that equally would not be a concern for you guys?

JO: Even, you know, the Dow separation reduces exposures to the rally in oil prices. Anyway, um, the company contributes around fifty percent today. it’s actually less volatile now than it was. So there’s a good argument for you know, against what you just said.

NB: Okay, let’s take a quick break. Reminder that you can find the contrarian investor podcast on itunes and on stitcher and spotify and anywhere else, we you can find a podcast. We are on the social media, but, uh, twitter at PodContrarian and and we also have an instagram, which I have not quite figure out yet. But that is ContrarianPod. You can find this on there, and it also on linked in. We have a Linkedin page too. Please check us out now. Um, Jim tell us where where we can find you.

JO: Absolutely. You can go to the Web. EMCgroup.com Remember the “c” in the middle. You can find a little bit about what we do, some fancy videos. But ultimately, we try and help investors and anyone who invests in special situations. I said before that I think traditional value investing is, you know, very, very difficult. But value investing, coupled with a catalyst and some sort of on restructuring and someone, you know and even to rely on someone who can actually understand like ourselves to present that is the way forward. So that’s what we do. Give us a call. Or drop us an email.

NB: Let’s continue here with the Dow DuPont Corteva discussion. We have not mentioned Corteva yet. I’m going to ask you about that. But first back to the challenge these are companies that also facing increasing competition. Um, from, you know, you talk about special situations. M&A. In this space, there was a recently a very big merger, as I’m sure you know Monsanto Bayer.

JO: Yeah.

NB: Is that not a cause for concern? The competition that could come from them?

JO: Well, I mean, yes and no. Like I say, I think, in some industries, we think big is better and in these particular focused industries, you’re getting a you know, even with Dow, don’t discount the fact that, you know, that you’re getting a dividend of around five percent. So it’s going to be one of the highest among any major companies in the material sector. So it’s going to make it attractive, and not only with the management like I keep saying. You’re going to find some real quality people within there. So, you know, I always fancied and from our experience in spin offs where we get real quality management, get real focused businesses, um, they really perform. And, uh, and you know what the dividend on the top of that is, uh, is another benefit. But like I say, I think that, you know, new companies coming on to the market like this, I say new, maybe, maybe not some new but new kind entitities. Then people go to focus on you know what? Who’s covered it? Is there any value in it? And this is where we receive hidden value in these things because, you know, you got a big company merging and it could take years for those synergies to come through. We believe that these synergies were being worked out before and, were evaluated. And that was just a chance of them realizing them. We think that potentially the sum of the parts could be worth over a hundred bucks in a year. So it’s an incentive for people to buy these companies right now. And another thing I don’t think the street or let’s let’s face it what’s left of the street, traditionally find some of these smaller companies or companies that spun off because they just don’t cover them. Or by the time they cover them, you know you an investor might have got a twenty five percent or thirty percent of it already, and then the street cover them, and then there’s a little bit more than at the time to reevaluate. So that traditionally is what we’ve seen, um, under coverage of the new companies. And so, you know, they’re often compared to some of these giant companies.

NB: Fair enough, okay? What do you know about Corteva? By the way, I don’t even know how to pronounce it. Is that cour-T-vah or court-EVah.

JO: Well, cou-T-vah. Until we hear different. it’s agriculture. it’s one of the leaders in the space. And it’s an extremely high margin business. It just sounds a little bit boring, and even my description is a little bit boring and people will perhaps ignore this piece. But we think it’s a very focused business, and, it’s the only listed agricultural company in the [inaudible]. Also, you’re going to get attention to this one and potentially, you know, we could see this one, I mean, there’s a two year rule with spinoffs, but if it’s taken over before the two years, you’re gonna have to pay the tax something down the line. This could be a target itself. It’s one of the ones that we highlight as a potential target down the road. But what we can see, uhm, and it could be a, uh, and if you want me to nine targets without Chem China, um, to increase its footprint in the U. S. So things like that. But, um, but great business. Um, interesting business, um, doesn’t sound it, but it is. And again, I want to emphasize the management when I emphasize the management through these companies, Um and, uh, and and potentially one the investors just watch for I think the the spinoff is the end of June. Um, so they want to kind of take a look at that, or call us for some more information on on the actual company.

NB: Yeah, that that would be very interesting. Indeed. You say, here is a pure play on agriculture and with this one listed here, which is FMC court the tickets up and see ah, market type of potentially $9.9 billion

JO: we think it could be one of the more interesting business like it’s extremely high margins. I think some of the debt is being dumped on, um from DWDP, even which is an additional when they saw spending. Um, but We still believe it’s got a very, very strong balance sheet. So it’s like, Sounds boring, but could be more interesting one because I’m not seeing any real research out there on the except us. I’m not seeing anyone shout about it, so definitely one you want to watch. Ah, could be. Could be. This could be, you know, the jewel in the crown of of the three. Remember, we had that first, but, um, but that’s let’s see how that plays out. You know, watch for the first earnings of these spinoff companies. Because frequently, what happens in the first earnings, the maiden earnings, is, and people miss this. Actually what a lot of people, miss this out there is you get incentives from the management. They are produced. So no, always, um, in front of spin offs do companies produce incentives to the management. They produce them on the first earnings and then and those are, like, ignored. Um, so watch out for that. And also watch for, um, indications of what the company’s going to do. What they’re going to be refinancing the debt, What they’re going to have dividends. It’s like you say all the stuff like that. So I say, you know, anyone who’s involved in the situation or who are looking to get involved in the situation is watch for the maiden earnings. One is because you get a lot of gold in there and, uh, usually, um, stuff that people just, um, miss. I don’t think there’s too much higher risk on this one. Low to medium risk. I mean, the the they’re well established companies. Um, there’s not a huge debt load being branded around. We’ve seeing some of these recently where they dumped a lot of debt, but [inaudible]. So if you want to get involved, um, buy the parent and, uh, and get in there for distribution and wait a little bit of time and see how it trades and you know, look for the valuations. I can come to other find valuations, and we can guide you. But, um, I like all the companies at the moment. It’s a great, spinoff. I think the value will be created in the next year, year, and a half. It won’t be created in the next month. As you highlighted before, Nate, the stocks have gone down so they’re really showing some value here, we believe. And, um, you know, one for your portfolio, I think. Or three for your portfolio.

NB: Okay, that’s that’s a good place to conclude. I’ve been talking with Jim Osman of the Edge consulting group here on the contrarian investor podcast. Please do check us out on Itunes and follow us on Twitter and the other social media. Um, thanks to Jim for coming on, Please remind listeners, Jim, where we can find you?

JO: www.edgecgroup.com

NB: Got it. Thank you so much. And thanks for listening. And we look forward to speaking to you again next time

Leave a Comment